This Journal is just user of this Committee on Publication Ethics

This Journal is just user of this Committee on Publication Ethics

Please browse the recommendations below then visit the Journal’s distribution web web site https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/ad-behav to upload your manuscript. Please be aware that manuscripts maybe not conforming to those instructions could be came back.

Just manuscripts of enough quality that meet with the aims and range of Adaptive Behavior will undoubtedly be evaluated.

There are not any charges payable to submit or publish in this log.

Within the distribution procedure you will end up necessary to justify which you have the rights in the work, that you are submitting the work for first publication in the Journal and that it is not being considered for publication elsewhere and has not already been published elsewhere, and that you have obtained and can supply all necessary permissions for the reproduction of any copyright works not owned by you that you are submitting your original work.

1. What do we publish?

1.1 Aims & Scope

Before submitting your manuscript to Adaptive Behavior, please ensure the aims have been read by yo & Scope.

1.2 Article Kinds

  • Articles – Manuscripts reporting initial research, typically containing between 6,000 and 12,000 terms.
  • Reviews – Major overviews of domain names of intellectual inquiry, typically containing significantly more than 12,000 terms.
  • Commentaries – extremely communications that are brief to formerly posted articles, typically containing under 500 terms.
  • Viewpoints – Evaluations of current research, hypotheses, and future trends, typically under 2,000 terms.
  • Brief communications – detailing research that is original, typically containing under 2,000 terms.
  • Book reviews – Quick communications giving an answer click reference to formerly published publications, typically under 2,000 terms.
  • Reports – Evaluations of seminars, workshops, as well as other intellectual gatherings, typically under 2,000 words.

1.3 Composing your paper

The SAGE Author Gateway has many advice that is general on how best to get posted, plus links to help expand resources.

1.3.1 Make your article discoverable

When composing your paper, think of how you are able to it discoverable. The name, key words and abstract are key to ensuring visitors find your article through se’s such as for instance Bing. For information and guidance on just how better to title your article, write your abstract and choose your key words, check out this site on the Gateway: How to greatly help visitors Find Your Article on line.

2. Editorial policies

2.1 Peer review policy

Adaptive Behavior operates under a regular single-blind reviewing policy where the reviewer’s title is often hidden through the author that is submitting.

All manuscripts are evaluated initially by certainly one of the Editors and just those papers that meet up with the editorial and scientific criteria associated with log, and fit in the aims and range for the log, should be sent for peer review. Generally speaking, reviews from at the least two referees that are independent needed.

Within the distribution procedure you’re going to be expected to produce the names of 3 peers whom might be contacted to examine your manuscript. Suggested reviewers must be specialists within their areas and really should have the ability to offer an assessment that is objective of manuscript. Please be familiar with any disputes of great interest whenever reviewers that are recommending. Samples of disputes of great interest include ( but they are not restricted to) the below:

  • The reviewer needs to have no knowledge that is prior of distribution
  • The reviewer must not have recently collaborated with some of the writers
  • Reviewer nominees through the exact same organization as some of the writers aren’t allowed

Take note that the Editors aren’t obliged to invite any reviewers that are recommended/opposed assess your manuscript.

2.2 Authorship

Documents should simply be submitted for consideration once permission is distributed by all adding writers. Those submitting documents should very very carefully check that dozens of whose work contributed to your paper are known as adding writers.
The menu of writers should include dozens of who are able to legitimately claim authorship. This can be dozens of who:

(i) produced significant share to the idea or design associated with the work; or purchase, analysis or interpretation of information,

(ii) Drafted this article or revised it critically for crucial content that is intellectual

(iii) authorized the variation become posted,

(iv) Each writer needs to have participated adequately within the strive to simply simply take general public obligation for appropriate portions for the content.

Writers should meet with the conditions out of all the true points above. Whenever a big, multicentre team has carried out the task, the team should determine the people who accept direct duty for the manuscript. Him or her should meet the criteria fully for authorship.

Purchase of funding, number of information, or supervision that is general of research team alone doesn’t represent authorship, although all contributors that do maybe perhaps perhaps not meet the requirements for authorship ought to be placed in the Acknowledgments section. Please make reference to the Global Committee of healthcare Journal Editors (ICMJE) authorship tips to learn more about authorship.

2.3 Acknowledgements

All contributors that do perhaps perhaps maybe not meet the requirements for authorship must be placed in an Acknowledgements area. Samples of those that might be recognized include an individual who supplied solely technical assistance, or even a division seat whom supplied just basic help.

2.3.1 assistance that is writing

Individuals who supplied composing assistance, e.g. from a professional communications business, usually do not qualify as writers and thus ought to be contained in the Acknowledgements area. Writers must reveal any writing support – like the name that is individual’s business and amount of input – and recognize the entity that taken care of this help.

It isn’t essential to reveal usage of language polishing services.

Any acknowledgements should appear first during the end of one’s article just before your Declaration of Conflicting passions (if relevant), any records along with your sources.

2.4 Funding

Adaptive Behavior requires all authors to acknowledge their money in a frequent fashion under a split heading. Please look at the Funding Acknowledgements web page in the SAGE Journal Author Gateway to verify the structure of this acknowledgment text in the case of capital, or suggest that: This research received no specific grant from any financing agency within the general public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

2.5 Declaration of conflicting passions

It will be the policy of Adaptive Behavior to require a statement of conflicting passions from all writers allowing a statement to be carried inside the paginated pages of most posted articles.

Please make certain that a ‘Declaration of Conflicting passions’ statement is roofed in the end of one’s manuscript, after any acknowledgements and prior to the sources. If no conflict exists, please suggest that ‘The Author(s) declare(s) there is no conflict of interest’. For help with conflict of great interest statements, please begin to see the ICMJE guidelines right right here.

2.6 Analysis Data

At SAGE we’re dedicated to assisting openness, transparency and reproducibility of research. Where relevant, Adaptive Behavior encourages writers to generally share their research information in an appropriate general public repository subject to ethical factors and where information is included, to incorporate a data accessibility declaration within their manuscript file. Writers must also follow information citation concepts. For lots more information please look at the analysis information Sharing Policies, which include information on SAGE’s partnership with all the information repository Figshare.